DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Pediatrics
SEARCH
Endroit courant :
>
> This Story


Ouverture ou Registre to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

More Industry Reports

Patient Monitors – Fighting alarm fatigue, EMR integration and going wireless A look at what's new from a range of manufacturers

C-arm sector features new models, improvements in technology Flat-panel detectors are driving the market

OEMs roll out new offerings for special procedures Numerous developments in the cath/⁠angio market

RTLS market for health care to exceed $3 billion by 2022 A guide to what's new and what's coming next

Ex-Ohio State University radiologist wins $100,000 discrimination lawsuit Cited 'criticism and unattainable productivity demands'

Bearing the load: What to consider when installing ceiling-mounted equipment An imaging department needs more than operational expertise

Bringing it all in-house: Intermountain Healthcare blazes the trail in Utah, Idaho Cut costs by $8 million over four-year period

Hospitals can save millions of dollars with MES contracts Long term contracts with OEMs offer big advantages to facilities ready to commit

Will retirements produce stress for service training? Keeping equipment humming as HTMs become fewer

PACS and RIS: Surviving a consolidated enterprise in the EMR era

From the January 2017 issue of DOTmed HealthCare Business News magazine

By Don Dennison

The trend of health provider organization mergers, acquisitions and affiliations to create multi-facility, multi-care setting networks is well documented. As is the adoption of a shared EMR across these enterprises. Such consolidated enterprises are faced with many opportunities to standardize their data, systems, practices and personnel structure to gain clinical and financial benefits. While the standardization of clinical records and systems is driven by the adoption of the shared EMR, imaging systems often lag behind. And past practices commonly used by imaging staff to consolidate data and systems need to be reassessed once a shared EMR is in place. Imaging informatics professionals need to understand the best practices for managing imaging records as part of a complete clinical record, owned by the EMR.

The consolidated enterprise
When several health care facilities and organizations that have operated independently come together to form a single entity, some normalization of data and systems needs to happen in order to gain the benefits of scale and integration. Also, providing authorized enterprise access to data through a common user interface increases productivity and reduces support complexity and costs. For imaging, this can mean the use of a common enterprise viewer embedded in the EMR user interface, and the use of a shared imaging archive that may be provided as part of a shared enterprise PACS or a vendor neutral archive (VNA).

Story Continues Below Advertisement

RaySafe helps you avoid unnecessary radiation

RaySafe solutions are designed to minimize the need for user interaction, bringing unprecedented simplicity & usability to the X-ray room. We're committed to establishing a radiation safety culture wherever technicians & medical staff encounter radiation.



One of the common benefits of a shared EMR is the availability of an enterprise master patient index (EMPI) which establishes a link across locally assigned patient IDs. This is an essential component for providing a longitudinal patient imaging record throughout the enterprise. It does require the use of imaging systems that can receive the EMPI value and have logic to manage a patient’s imaging records that have been acquired in the different facilities under different patient identity domains.

Consolidating imaging records — traditional techniques
Prior to a shared EMR being in place, when data consolidation from disparate facility systems was performed, rudimentary methods were often used to ensure values for different patient information fields were unique. For example, patient ID and accession number. The uniqueness of these and other fields are critical to prevent the records for different patients, acquired in different organizations that may have used a similar numbering scheme, from being incorrectly linked when stored in the same system.
  Pages: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 >>

Related:


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

La publicité d'email
Développez la notoriété de votre marque
Enchères + Ventes Privées
Obtenir le meilleur prix
Acheter des équipement / pièces
Trouver le meilleur prix
Infos du jour
Lire Les dernières nouvelles
Annuaire
Consulter tous les utilisateurs DOTmed
Éthique concernant DOTmed
Voir notre programme d'éthique
L'or partie le programme de fournisseur
Recevoir des demandes PH
Programme de marchand de service d'or
Recevoir des demandes
Fournisseurs de soins de santé
Voir tous les outils des HCP (abréviation pour les professionnels de la santé)
Jobs/Formation
Trouver / combler un poste
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Obtenir des devis de pièces
Voir les utilisateurs récemment certifiés
Voir les utilisateurs récemment certifiés
Récemment évalué sur DOTmed
Voir les utilisateurs récemment certifiés
Central de location
Louer de l’équipement à moindre prix
Vendre des équipements / pièces
Obtenir le maximum d'argent
Service Technicians Forum
Trouver de l'aide et des conseils
Simple demande de propositions
Obtenir des devis pour des appareils
Expo Virtuelle
Trouver des services d'appareils
L'Access et l'utilisation de cet emplacement est sujet aux modalités et aux conditions du notre de nos MENTIONS LEGALES & DONNEES PERSONELLES
Propriété de et classe des propriétaires DOTmedà .com, inc. Copyright ©2001-2019 DOTmed.com, Inc.
TOUS DROITS RÉSERVÉS