Over 1650 Total Lots Up For Auction at Seven Locations - FL 10/18, NJ 10/19, MN 10/20, NY 10/22, NY 10/25, TX 10/28, CA 10/29

ASTRO « a déçu » par des directives de criblage d'USPSTF PSA

par Brendon Nafziger, DOTmed News Associate Editor | May 25, 2012
The American Society for Radiation Oncology said it was "disappointed" by a U.S. Preventive Services Task Force panel's recommendation that healthy men avoid prostate-specific antigen screenings for prostate cancer, saying a "blanket no-testing policy" was wrong and that the decision to screen should be left to doctors and their patients.

"ASTRO acknowledges that PSA screening isn't a perfect method of detecting prostate cancer," the group, the world's largest radiation oncologist society, said in a statement Thursday. "However, many patients' lives are saved by catching their prostate cancer early, and over the last 30 years we have achieved a 30 percent decline in the death rate from prostate cancer due in part to better screening."

In final recommendations released earlier this week, USPSTF said PSA screenings did more harm than good because they had a high false positive rate and also led to the possibly needless treatment of slow-growing cancers. According to the group, evidence suggests nearly 1,000 men would need to be screened to save one life, although many more would suffer complications from biopsies or interventions.

Servicing GE, Philips and Siemens CT equipment with OEM trained engineers

Numed, a well established company in business since 1975 provides a wide range of service options including time & material service, PM only contracts, full service contracts, labor only contracts & system relocation. Call 800 96 Numed for more info.

ASTRO, which represents about 10,000 radiation oncologists, isn't the first group to come out against it. The ruling was slammed by the American Urological Association, the country's biggest urologist society.


Ambrish Gupta

PSA screenings

May 28, 2012 11:09

Would we like to test the recommendation in court?

I believe the Task Force members should be personally liable for malpractice.

Any other thoughts?

Log inor Register

to rate and post a comment

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment