Clean Sweep Live Auction on Wed. May 1st. Click to view the full inventory

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Pediatrics
Endroit courant :
> This Story

Ouverture ou Registre to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Send us your Comments




More Industry Headlines

Peeling back the Medicare Advantage onion Understanding the high growth rate of MA plan coverage

FDA finds duodenoscope contamination risk still too high Up to 5.4 percent of properly collected samples has 'high concern' organisms

Israeli researchers develop first 3D heart from patient's biological materials A first — complete with blood vessels, ventricles and cells

Air medical transportation: How a 15-minute ride may cost $30,000, and how we can change it Reducing sky-high transport expenses

Using comic illustrations to support patient understanding of cardiac catheterization Making patients more satisfied, less anxious and more informed

X-ray sheds new light on ancient mummy The Everhart Museum in PA tapped Geisinger Radiology for help

Breaking barriers in Alzheimer’s disease with focused ultrasound Researchers at Sunnybrook in Toronto are closing the therapeutic gap

HHS releases second draft of TEFCA for nationwide interoperability Requirements for sharing electronic health information

Improving surgical outcomes by imaging head and neck tumors in real time Researchers use tech developed by Perimeter Medical Imaging

Future-ready medical devices - Answering the current and future needs of patients and users

La santé de providence gagne la négligence réclamante de costume avec les disques patients

par Astrid Fiano , DOTmed News Writer
The Oregon Court of Appeals handed down a decision Wednesday ruling against the plaintiffs of a class-action lawsuit, who had claimed that Providence Health-Oregon of Portland, Ore. had negligently failed to safeguard unencrypted records with private patient information that was stolen from a Providence employee's car.

The facts alleged in the case are that a Providence employee medical care provider had taken home some computer disks and tapes, leaving the items in his car, from where the theft occurred. The items contained unencrypted patient records for around 365,000 individuals, including names, addresses, phone numbers, social security numbers and patient care information. A little over three weeks after the theft, Providence alerted each patient as to the loss of data and advised them to take precautions.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Servicing GE Nuclear Medicine equipment with OEM trained engineers

We offer full service contracts, PM contracts, rapid response, time and material,camera relocation. Nuclear medicine equipment service provider since 1975. Click or call now for more information 800 96 NUMED

The plaintiff patients then filed suit against Providence, accusing it of negligence and of violating the Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA) by a representation to keep patient information confidentiality, when it had not sufficiently ensured such confidentiality. The plaintiffs had argued they suffered exposure to loss of privacy and costs for monitoring credit reports and fraud alerts. A trial court had granted Providence's motion to dismiss the case.

In the Court of Appeals opinion, the court said that the negligence claims failed because the plaintiffs were not able to prove the primary element of a negligence tort: duty. In this case, a duty to guard against the specific harm alleged -- trauma associated with the loss of personal medical information as a result of theft.

As to the UTPA claim, the court explained that the UTPA protects against false representations of goods or services that have benefits, standards or qualities that in fact are not present. The plaintiffs' theory of UTPA violation appeared to be that a. Providence's role as provider of medical services was subject to state and federal confidentiality laws; b. Providence allegedly represented, in offering its services and products, to keep patients' private information confidential; and c. the company did not have procedures and practices in place to protect the information against a loss by theft and therefore, the services were not of the standard or quality represented. The plaintiffs then claimed that due to the alleged violation of the UTPA, they faced a threat of monetary or property loss due to the theft, and claimed damages for costs to forestall the threatened losses.

The court rejected that argument, saying that the plaintiffs had not alleged a loss of money or property as a result of any misrepresentations, but rather for alleged out-of-pocket expenses to prevent a potential loss of money or property through identity theft that might result from the misrepresentations. The court said that there is no authority for covering a "once removed" covered entity under the UTPA.


Développez la notoriété de votre marque
Enchères + Ventes Privées
Obtenir le meilleur prix
Acheter des équipement / pièces
Trouver le meilleur prix
Infos du jour
Lire Les dernières nouvelles
Consulter tous les utilisateurs DOTmed
Éthique concernant DOTmed
Voir notre programme d'éthique
L'or partie le programme de fournisseur
Recevoir des demandes PH
Programme de marchand de service d'or
Recevoir des demandes
Fournisseurs de soins de santé
Voir tous les outils des HCP (abréviation pour les professionnels de la santé)
Les travaux/Formation
Trouver / combler un poste
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Obtenir des devis de pièces
Certification Récentes
Voir les utilisateurs récemment certifiés
Evaluation Récentes
Voir les utilisateurs récemment certifiés
Central de location
Louer de l’équipement à moindre prix
Vendre des équipements / pièces
Obtenir le maximum d'argent
Service le forum de techniciens
Trouver de l'aide et des conseils
Simple demande de propositions
Obtenir des devis pour des appareils
Expo Virtuelle
Trouver des services d'appareils
L'Access et l'utilisation de cet emplacement est sujet aux modalités et aux conditions du notre de nos MENTIONS LEGALES & DONNEES PERSONELLES
Propriété de et classe des propriétaires DOTmedà .com, inc. Copyright ©2001-2019 DOTmed.com, Inc.